Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1918 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3210 - 151 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $50.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3210 - $0.33 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
150
99.33774834437085%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
70.21276595744682%
Price, $
$70
71%
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349768 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
82.62987012987013%
Multi-Core
1018
96.86013320647004%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
