Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1208 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2400S - 162 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $48.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2400S - $0.3 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 54 vs 65 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349623 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
155
95.67901234567901%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
66.66666666666666%
Price, $
$70
68%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
47.64649375600384%
Multi-Core
1352
66.04787493893502%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |