Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 732 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450 - 126 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $48.0 vs $69.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450 - $0.38 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 54 vs 77 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349637 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
95.23809523809523%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
66.66666666666667%
Price, $
$69
69%
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349635 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
57.925072046109506%
Multi-Core
1781
87.00537371763556%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |