Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 932 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 18% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8150 - 164 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than FX-8150 - $48.0 vs $64.03
- Up to 37% better value when playing Dirt 5 than FX-8150 - $0.29 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349620 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
139
84.7560975609756%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
63.043478260869556%
Price, $
$64.03
74%
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349619 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |