Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1696 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-750 - 126 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-750 - $48.0 vs $75.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-750 - $0.38 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349622 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
117
92.85714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
59.375%
Price, $
$75
64%
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |