Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 485 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 15% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3210 - 164 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $48.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-3210 - $0.29 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349620 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
142
86.58536585365853%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
59.183673469387756%
Price, $
$70
68%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349619 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
48.89529298751201%
Multi-Core
1018
49.73131411822179%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |