Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 761 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 13% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4150T - 169 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $108.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 57% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-4150T - $0.64 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 12 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
149
88.16568047337277%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
43.24324324324324%
Price, $
$219.95
49%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360840 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360842 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
69.93464052287581%
Multi-Core
1742
30.771948419007245%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |