Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7600 is 978 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4150T - 265 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $99.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 58% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-4150T - $0.37 vs $0.88 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
249
93.9622641509434%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
42.04545454545455%
Price, $
$219.95
45%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361037 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
265
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
62.34522942461762%
Multi-Core
1742
45.697796432318995%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |