Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-870 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-870 - 151 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $100.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 53% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4150T - $0.69 vs $1.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
47.26027397260274%
Price, $
$219.95
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360826 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
144
95.36423841059603%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |