Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 488 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4150T - 172 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $100.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 55% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4150T - $0.58 vs $1.3 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
98.25581395348837%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
44.61538461538461%
Price, $
$219.95
45%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360848 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
71.69179229480737%
Multi-Core
1742
74.57191780821918%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |