Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 700 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $82.8 vs $94.05
- Up to 13% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.41 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280516 minutes ago
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |