Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $66.82 vs $133.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-10600KF - $0.34 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i3-7100T - 205 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
197
96.09756097560975%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
52.307692307692314%
Price, $
$133
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
66.19217081850533%
Multi-Core
2260
33.14268954392139%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |