Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 366 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 174 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $109.99 vs $145.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-9100 - $0.64 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280368 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |