Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 441 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $115.0 vs $450.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $2.25 vs $7.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 22% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-9100F - 62 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 24 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
82.25806451612904%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.26/FPS
30.991735537190085%
Price, $
$450
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
79.4679005205321%
Multi-Core
3669
36.580259222333%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |