Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $115.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900K - $0.95 vs $3.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-9100F - 125 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
96.8%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348919 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.92/FPS
24.23469387755102%
Price, $
$490
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348919 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
78.55917667238423%
Multi-Core
3669
40.04147113390811%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |