Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 202 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $115.0 vs $530.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.42 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-9100F - 280 vs 277 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 24 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
277
98.92857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
22.222222222222225%
Price, $
$530
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |