Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 216 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $115.0 vs $515.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.57 vs $2.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i3-9100F - 206 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
200
97.0873786407767%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348902 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
22.799999999999997%
Price, $
$515
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348902 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
80.63380281690141%
Multi-Core
3669
34.30254300673149%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |