Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 1735 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1820 - 115 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $46.41 vs $99.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-9100T - $0.42 vs $0.86 per FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
48.837209302325576%
Price, $
$99
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349393 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
110
95.65217391304348%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
40.81463009143807%
Multi-Core
825
25.959723096286975%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |