Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-3570 - 240 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $69.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 32% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-10400F - $0.32 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
68.08510638297874%
Price, $
$112.53
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349396 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
214
89.16666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
656
45.618915159944365%
Multi-Core
1924
33.45505129542688%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |