Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-6600 - 142 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $74.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 33% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-10400F - $0.53 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
67.08860759493672%
Price, $
$112.53
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
139
97.88732394366197%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1286
89.4297635605007%
Multi-Core
3552
61.76317162232655%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |