Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 26% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 1300X - 53 vs 42 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $65.23 vs $112.53
- Up to 27% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-10400F - $1.55 vs $2.12 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
73.11320754716981%
Price, $
$112.53
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349393 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
42
79.24528301886792%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
1097
76.2865090403338%
Multi-Core
3157
54.894800904190575%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |