Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-7400T - 168 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $63.5 vs $112.53
- Up to 42% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10400F - $0.39 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
58.2089552238806%
Price, $
$112.53
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349405 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
162
96.42857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
70.72322670375522%
Multi-Core
2806
48.791514519214054%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |