Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 16% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G3930 - 145 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $98.02 vs $299.95
- Up to 62% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-10600 - $0.78 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
37.68115942028986%
Price, $
$299.95
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
125
86.20689655172413%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.50538315389487%
Multi-Core
1043
16.890688259109314%
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |