Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 60 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $143.72 vs $530.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $2.4 vs $11.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348677 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
48
80%
Value, $/FPS
$11.04/FPS
21.73913043478261%
Price, $
$530
27%
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |