Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8150 - 172 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $64.03 vs $133.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10600KF - $0.42 vs $0.77 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
54.54545454545454%
Price, $
$133
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349517 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
154
89.53488372093024%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |