Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 214 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $98.02 vs $153.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-12400 - $0.51 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
71.83098591549296%
Price, $
$153
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348840 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
89.25233644859813%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
27.902707664066085%
Multi-Core
1043
11.78930710975472%
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |