Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 65% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8320 - 231 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $102.02 vs $244.85
- Up to 31% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-13500 - $0.73 vs $1.06 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
68.86792452830188%
Price, $
$244.85
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
140
60.60606060606061%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13500 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |