Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3556 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 37% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3210 - 169 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $70.0 vs $297.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-13600K - $0.57 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
32.38636363636363%
Price, $
$297.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
123
72.7810650887574%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
19.099437148217635%
Multi-Core
1018
6.8561422413793105%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |