Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1208 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-2400S - 126 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $48.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-2400S - $0.38 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 54 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
118
93.65079365079364%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
64.40677966101696%
Price, $
$70
68%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350028 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
47.64649375600384%
Multi-Core
1352
66.04787493893502%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |