Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 548 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Celeron G1820 - 161 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - $46.41 vs $69.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-3470 - $0.3 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
69.76744186046511%
Price, $
$69
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349866 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
156
96.8944099378882%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349866 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
78.93890675241157%
Multi-Core
825
44.83695652173913%
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |