Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3550 is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-8300 - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-3550 - $47.98 vs $335.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-3550 - $0.4 vs $2.7 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.7/FPS
14.814814814814813%
Price, $
$335
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349270 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
121
97.58064516129032%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |