Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4440 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4440 is 690 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Performs up to 9% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8150 - 107 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-4440 - $64.03 vs $131.71
- Up to 47% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-4440 - $0.65 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 8 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
52.84552845528455%
Price, $
$131.71
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $131.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360527 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
98
91.58878504672897%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360526 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |