Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570S outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570S is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570S
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than FX-8300 - 255 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-4570S - $47.98 vs $59.57
- Up to 9% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-4570S - $0.21 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570S - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
91.30434782608695%
Price, $
$59.57
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for $59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354083 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
234
91.76470588235294%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354082 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570S | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |