Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570T is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Performs up to 21% better in Starfield than FX-8150 - 52 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-4570T - $64.03 vs $90.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-4570T - $1.49 vs $1.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570T - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
86.1271676300578%
Price, $
$90
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349704 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
43
82.6923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |