Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2479 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $53.5 vs $198.9
- Up to 70% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600K - $0.29 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 88 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4690K - 204 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
185
90.68627450980392%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
29.896907216494846%
Price, $
$198.9
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
1287
58.87465690759378%
Multi-Core
3631
42.32428021913976%
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |