Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than FX-8150 - 130 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $64.03 vs $198.9
- Up to 62% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600K - $0.58 vs $1.53 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
37.908496732026144%
Price, $
$198.9
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348919 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
110
84.61538461538461%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |