Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 214 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $46.41 vs $198.9
- Up to 74% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - $0.24 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
25.806451612903224%
Price, $
$198.9
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
190
88.78504672897196%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
22.461116193961576%
Multi-Core
825
9.616505420212146%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |