Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than FX-8150 - 56 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-7500 - $64.03 vs $89.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-7500 - $1.49 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
93.71069182389937%
Price, $
$89
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349936 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
43
76.78571428571429%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349935 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |