Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 38% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8300 - 324 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - $47.98 vs $69.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-7500T - $0.2 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
324
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
95.23809523809524%
Price, $
$69
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360867 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
235
72.53086419753086%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360866 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |