Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4454 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $100.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900K - $0.69 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 33% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-760 - 191 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
144
75.39267015706807%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361512 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
25.182481751824813%
Price, $
$522.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
15.366509751176865%
Multi-Core
1280
6.352987889616836%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |