Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $100.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900K - $4.35 vs $7.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 174% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-760 - 63 vs 23 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
23
36.507936507936506%
Value, $/FPS
$4.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361514 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.78/FPS
55.91259640102827%
Price, $
$490
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361514 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
26.12921669525443%
Multi-Core
1280
13.969224053257667%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |