Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 3015 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $100.0 vs $595.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-9920X - $0.2 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-760 - 533 vs 504 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
504
94.55909943714822%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361667 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
533
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
17.857142857142858%
Price, $
$595
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
32.34253361641897%
Multi-Core
1280
13.556449904681212%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |