Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1723
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1723
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 2144 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $100.0 vs $651.07
- Up to 83% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-6950X - $0.85 vs $5.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-760 - 130 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 20 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
118
90.76923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-760 Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361632 minutes ago
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.01/FPS
16.96606786427146%
Price, $
$651.07
15%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80671I76950X Boxed Core i7-6950X Processor Extreme Edition (25M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 3.0 10
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361633 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
35.28957528957529%
Multi-Core
1280
15.153308867053392%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
