Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 187 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $39.95 vs $160.91
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9400 - $0.24 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
27.906976744186046%
Price, $
$160.91
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349396 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
90.9090909090909%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
41.97976878612717%
Multi-Core
992
20.688216892596458%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |