Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than Celeron G4900 - 732 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $50.0 vs $170.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-9600K - $0.07 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
732
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
30.434782608695656%
Price, $
$170
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361578 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
680
92.89617486338798%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
35.981308411214954%
Multi-Core
1051
16.24922696351268%
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |