Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Celeron G4900 - 727 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $50.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-10700F - $0.07 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
727
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
22.580645161290324%
Price, $
$225.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361748 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
680
93.53507565337001%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
38.21339950372209%
Multi-Core
1051
14.53464251140921%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |