Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8150 - 148 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $64.03 vs $247.71
- Up to 69% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-10700K - $0.52 vs $1.67 per FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
31.137724550898206%
Price, $
$247.71
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349267 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
122
82.43243243243244%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |