Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 1848 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 54% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3930 - 225 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $98.02 vs $265.49
- Up to 43% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-12700 - $0.67 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
56.779661016949156%
Price, $
$265.49
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348791 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
146
64.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348791 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
26.515481901439163%
Multi-Core
1043
9.675324675324676%
Intel Core i7-12700 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |