Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Valheim than FX-8150 - 229 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $64.03 vs $373.59
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700K - $0.34 vs $1.63 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
20.858895705521473%
Price, $
$373.59
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $373.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
189
82.53275109170306%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |