Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2600K outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2600K is 841 days older than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than FX-6350 - 215 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than FX-6350 - $70.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-6350 - $0.33 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349816 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
209
97.20930232558139%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
68.75000000000001%
Price, $
$100
70%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |